The camera's zoom lens was 7-70 mm (38 - 380 mm equiv. It reminds me of an effect I have seen a few times, 15 years ago, in the days of the Olympus C-2100 UZ, a 2.1 MP 10x zoom camera. But the vintage lens 'look' has been popular in still photography for over a decade, such as with Lomography and Lensbaby lenses, and undoubtably cinematographers have caught on to the trend. I could see that an anamorphic lens could alter optical aberrations in some manner. The use of anamorphic lenses could alter the effect: these capture a wide image on a narrower sensor, compressed horizontally, and the resulting image has to be stretched during postproduction. I doubt it, these usually cost as much as a luxury car or small house, and are usually of the highest optical quality outside of military, espionage, or scientific uses.
Or some technical limitation of cine lenses? IMDB has a number of stills from that show, and I couldn't see a similar effect, so maybe it was a conscious choice for that scene. But this can also be simulated by software.Īlmost certainly. It's possible that it is field curvature, where instead of having a flat focus plane, it is curved. It’s just that as you move to the edges, the images become out of focused, almost as if the lens is decentered or something - though obviously that’s not possible for multimillion dollar productions. This is not due to depth of field, as the edges are often on the same plane of focus at the subject.
#Mac soft pro lens blur tv
I’ve noticed that in many of the TV shows I watch now, the edges of the images are blurry. I would expect something like this in a scene of a dream or some druggeds perspective maybe, but on a "normal" scene this is nothing I would like to see. Besides, I think it looks pretty ugly too. The distribution looks artificial to me, so I suspect it's a digital filter. It’s just when you move to the edge of the frame that it becomes defocused. And if you look closely at the trees in the center, there are plenty of trees both much further and much closer, and they’re mostly all in focus. Focus seems to be on the trees in the centre, not on the man, nor on the foreground. The tree that goes out the top right corner is even closer. The tree on the left of the first capture is much closer to the camera than the group of three trees near the middle of the fame. It is hard to be sure from a cellphone snap of a TV screen, but I don't see anything that cannot be explained by a shallow DOF. You can see the trees in the middle are in focus, but are you move to the edges, it becomes blurred It’s from the Apple TV series, defending Jacob. I’ve included a screenshot (sorry for the poor quality, DRM, had to take a photo of the TV with my iPhone). So is this a conscious creative style? Or some technical limitation of cine lenses? if you are having trouble with this, respond to this post or hit my YouTube Read (you'll see valorant edits) and I can make a YouTube tutorial for better explanation.I’ve noticed that in many of the TV shows I watch now, the edges of the images are blurry. it should show up in the final cut "blur" section after you've saved it. and then you can open it up in finder and rename the folder to what you want the effect to be called. now just save it with cmd+s>save original. this basically adds a control to the effect for each parameter so you can adjust them in final cut. click the arrow and select "publish" from the dropdown menu. if you hover to the right of each parameter, a little downward arrow should appear. on the top-left of the screen, click "inspector" and make sure you're under the "filters" tab. then it should show up under the effect source. then, while you have "effect source" highlighted, click "filters" at the top of the screen, blur>defocus. If you have motion, you can open a copy of gaussian blur in motion by right clicking on the effect in fcpx and selecting "open a copy in motion." then on the timeline, select the gaussian blur track and delete it. So I figured it out myself! I've been experimenting recently in motion. Yo, I was looking for a solution on the internet to this exact problem, but couldn't find one.
0 kommentar(er)
